🔗 Share this article

As Donald Trump's influence wanes and his public demeanor becomes more erratic, there has been an escalation in vitriolic attacks aimed at female journalists and racial minorities, including Somali immigrants being the latest target. These disparaging remarks gain traction stems from their malice and his platform, not their factual accuracy. Similarly, his administration's offensive against immigrants are haphazard and founded on falsehoods. The evidence makes it obvious that the goal extends beyond targeting individuals with criminal histories. The true target is anyone with brown skin.

From Native Americans carrying tribal IDs to American citizens by choice, from essential workers in building sites and hospitals to those who served, university attendees, residents asleep in their beds, and toddlers: a broad cross-section of the country's population is under siege.

"Immigration enforcement raids are cruel, unjust and achieve nothing for public safety," states a prominent New York City official. Scenes featuring officers concealing their faces shattering windows and separating parents from children, instilling fear and hindering the function of institutions, achieves the opposite effect.

The cycles of calculated hatred—directed at people from Haiti in the 2024 campaign, Venezuelan migrants this spring, and now Somalis—lean heavily on defamatory falsehoods and slurs. This is because: the actual facts about these communities do not justify such hostility.

The Imaginary White Nation Versus Actual History

The strategy of frightening and vilifying claims to seek at recreating a homogeneously white America which is a fiction. While the US was demographically whiter in the youth of today's white supremacists, it never constituted a purely white nation. In 1776, the thirteen founding colonies contained a substantial percentage of African and Native American individuals—certain states in the South had Black populations exceeding a third.

When the United States expanded, annexing Texas in 1844 and acquiring northern Mexico in 1848, it absorbed a vast Spanish-speaking population already living across the modern Southwest and California. Historical records show the first African Muslim in territory that became the U.S. came as part of a Spanish expedition almost one hundred years before the Mayflower Puritan passengers landed in Massachusetts in 1620.

Demographic Realities Against Forced Dreams

The persecution of huge populations of brown-skinned individuals and even mass deportations will not manufacture the ethnically pure country of far-right dreams. A city like Los Angeles, for instance, is close to 50% Hispanic, and despite enforcement outrages, detentions and removals, it remains so. The city's very name is Spanish, an enduring reminder of who was there first.

The entirety of this animus and oppression looks like the fear of bigots who pretend they can halt the demographic future of a country that is ceasing to be predominantly white by using pure cruelty.

It is coupled with an assault on reproductive rights that is, at times, openly intended to encourage white women to bear more babies. The argument points to a fertility rate below replacement level in the US, a trend less impactful than in other countries due to a hard-working population of immigrant laborers that sustains the economy. However, rather than providing the societal assistance that might make raising children easier, the strategy has been based on punishment and force.

A prominent journalist notes that the reproductive politics espoused by figures like JD Vance—along with insults aimed at women without children—amount to pronatalism. This ideology "typically merges worries about declining birth rates with anti-immigration and anti-feminist ideas."

In a similar vein, analyses show that "efforts to bolster the birth rate do not compensate for broader policies designed to cut federal support programs like healthcare for the poor and insurance for kids. This focus on families is not just for encouraging procreation. Instead, it is being weaponized to advance a conservative agenda that endangers women's health, bodily autonomy, and labor force involvement."

Contradictory Strategies and Public Rejection

The combination of anti-immigration and pronatalist policies represent an attempt to forcibly alter the country's population future. Ultimately, they represent foolish bullying by individuals filled with hatred who inadvertently reveal that their assertions of being better must be rooted in race and gender; absent these categories, their arguments collapse into incoherent nonsense.

Much of the justification put forward by the administration fails to align with observable realities and real-world results. As an instance, naval operations in the Caribbean Sea frequently focus on tiny boats not confirmed to be carrying narcotics and incapable of reaching US shores. Likewise, Venezuela's involvement in fentanyl trafficking is minimal, and its involvement with cocaine is far less than that of other South American nations.

The government's position extends to climate issues, with a dismissal of "the science of climate change" and "Net Zero goals." An emotional attachment to fossil fuels, especially coal mining, resulting in measures that compel localities to spend money on obsolete and toxic power sources while undermining cheaper, cleaner renewables. Concurrently, health officials have promoted anti-scientific dietary schemes while weakening general public health safeguards.

The core premise of the attacks on immigrants is that people of color not born in the US are dangerous intruders. Yet, from coast to coast—in cities like L.A. and Charlotte, Chicago to Portland—it is the administration's own agents, immigration enforcement personnel, whom local communities view as the dangerous and hostile interlopers.

There is no clearer sign of the broad repudiation of this approach than the countless individuals organizing, protesting, risking safety and arrest to protect their communities. Municipality after municipality has stood up in protection of its people. No amount of derogatory language and threats can alter this fundamental truth.